Love Through the Ages Essay

It is better to ache cheatd and lost then to have never revered at all. Edna St. Vincent Millay (1892-1950), a famous poet from the modern period, published come is non all in 1931, centuries after To My god-fearing and agreeable economise, by puritan poet Anne Bradstreet (1612-1672), was published in 1678. While comparing these both poems, one can see m any similarities and differences ascribed to the dissimilar time periods they were create verbally.To My Dear and Loving Husband and Love is not all ar different in their content and meaning. Although both of the poets are exploring the relationship between love and remainder, they come to different results at the end of their work. Bradstreet finds her love for her husband so worthy when she learns, I prize thy love more than whole mines of specie(l.5). On the other hand Millay thinks that she might be driven to shell out his love for peace,(l.12). One can notice a contrast in tone between the two poems. Bradstreets tone is spiritual, while Millays tone is playful.There is one paradox in each of the poems. In To My Dear and Loving Husband, Bradstreet explains that people who are no continuing alive on earth can be alive ever in heaven. She says, that when we live no more, we may live ever(l.12). Millay explains that love cant save lives however people can neglect without it. This paradox is spread in the first six lines of the poem. Although these poems are pen in different time periods, they have many similarities considering their content and meaning.Ann Bradstreet and Edna St. Vincent Millay have different styles. Part of this difference is ascribed to the different time periods in which they lived. In To My Dear and Loving Husband images like gold, debt, and nature are whatever that come to readers mind, but in Love is not all one can see more images while schooling the poem. People rising and sinking, blood, and fractured bones are some of them. The two poems are different in their diction too. Millays diction is contemporary but Bradstreets diction is archaic and old fashioned. She functions words and phrases that were common in seventeenth century language as when she says, Thy love is such I can no way repay (l.9). Although a regular reader may not notice, both poems haverhyming scheme.To My Dear and Loving Husband is written in rhyming couplets, meanwhile Love is not all is written in English or Shakespearean sonnet. The use of metonymical language is not really noticeable in any of the poems. Bradstreet says, My love is such that rivers cannot quench, nor ought but love from thee, give recompense. , which is the only metaphor she uses in her poem (l.6). Millays most noticeable use of figurative language is when she says, Yet many a man is making friends with death, which is a personification (l.7). As explained, the different time periods in which these poems were written causes the greatest difference in their style.If I wanted to write a poem some what love, I would write about the love of make for her child. I conceive the mothers love is the purest and most gorgeous love. I would include many images showing how a mother cares about her child and how her love is unconditional. I would also use figurative language to explain the love of a mother for her child. I may say how a mother protects her child from all the dangers by comparing it to nature. Or I may use simile to show how desperate a child can be without her mothers support and care. I would conclude my poem by trying to make the reader believe that people should have more respect and care about their parents and the accompaniment that without them, they would be nothing.