To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee Analysis

To almost extent, the characters in some(prenominal) stories witnessm to be ruled by inflexible brains, disadvantages and peculiar(a) loving values and attitudes. Explain and equate how each writer re ext deaths with this aspect. You might akin to consider friendly con textual matter and values, prison term, plot, elan and language, as well as the characters themselves. TKAMB and An visionary charwoman be stories whose plot revolves approximately the mind of blemishs, fond status and the attitudes of the epoch in which they ar based.Both texts deal with these issues further in slightly divers(prenominal) ways, because An visionary cleaning lady is a compendious story, there isnt enough space to administer prejudices of wholly the characters in detail except because TKAMB is a novel, over the story although maybe not sayly, the characters, soulfulness-to-somebodyities and viewpoints argon developed until you nooky form an fairly solid idea of what they considerd in and what they were wish.For example, TKAMB is pitch in the 1920s and 30s at which succession the prejudice of whites against unrelentings was very plain even though slavery had been abolished long time before the blacks were treated as fleck sort out citizens. This is a principal(prenominal) mover of the plot and as Scout (Jean Louise Finch) is outgrowth up it started to be buzz clear up appargonnt to her at an early age when she, Jem and Calpurnia visited Calpurnias church Lula stop but she said You aint got no vexation bringin white chillun here they got their own church, we got ourn so later in the story of the visitation of Tom Robinson Vs Mr. Ewell Lemme tell you well-nighthin now, Billy a third said, You know the court appointive him to stage this nigga. , Yeah, but Atticus aims to defend him. Thats what I dont standardised about it in addition the use of the offensive term nigger (deriving from Spanish word negro means black), which tod ay is politic totallyy incorrect, is a cut of the prejudice and sociable split surrounded by blacks and whites at that time.Atticus is an exception to this prejudice as are his children as aunty Alexandra puts it I mean this town. Theyre perfectly hustling to let him do what they are similarly afraid to do themselves. In refer to Atticus defending Tom Robinson, a black person. In An fantastic muliebrity there isnt such prejudices as among blacks and whites but seeing as it is set in the 1800s there is an element of prejudices as between males and females She had never antecedently regarded this commercial enterprise of his as any objection to having him for a husband.Indeed, the necessity of getting life-leased at all cost, a cardinal virtue which all life-threatening m another(prenominal)s teach This means, she does not see her husbands job as a rationalness not to marrying him, after all she take some one to bring in some cash, the idea that women themselves cann ot do so because they are not allowed to work. This explains why Ella Marchmill is at substructure most of the time and has the time to write all the poetry. The fact that she had to pretend to be a man is also a sign of prejudice against women at that time as by chance because nobody would believe such poetry could come from a womans hand.In TKAMB Harper Lee deals with social etiquette and ideals and makes them very apparent and openly deals with them as it is the main question of the plot, in An Imaginative charwoman doubting Thomas Hardy does not openly express the social ideas as prejudice, even vista this may be because they were openly and socially acceptable at the time and unlike TKAMB, An Imaginative Woman is not set in a time of change, such as black rights movements and female liberation movements where raft became widely familiar with, and accepted prejudice was happening.In TKAMB many people who are examples of polar castes in smart set, Aunt Alexandra being on e of them Aunt Alexandra was one of the last of her chassis she had a river boat, boarding school tact let any moral come along and she would uphold it. Aunt Alexandra is fixed into society by morals and personal standards that she considers to be very high and this makes herself see to be upper break society, but she will still gossip She was and incurable gossip and will still larrup in what would seem to be a lower class of society.You also guide examples of people who in contrast are of a lower caste of society for example, the Cunninghams who appear to progress to no money because they are farmers and when the economic crash happened in America it hit them the hardest The Cunninghams never took anything off of anybody, they get along on what they convey, they dont overhear frequently but they get along on it. When Jem tries to describe the caste arranging of Maycomb towards the end of the contain the social attitudes of the time are very apparent Theres four kind s of folk in the world. Theres the ordinary family rail line like us and the neighbors, theres the kind like the Cunninghams out in the woods, the kind like the Ewells down at the dump, and the Negroes This puts richer white people higher up poor white people, higher up white trash and finally above black people. In An Imaginative Woman the idea of social caste is perhaps not so apparent.The main theme of the text is the ideas of mating, as it was in the 1800s carve up was unthinkable otherwise Ella would have left hand-hand(a) her husband She came to some vague conclusions, and since then(prenominal) had kept her heart alive by pitying her proprietors obtuseness and want of politeness Also affairs in marriage was not common place and by-blow children were prejudiced against, it was a widely conceived thought that if a child was not innate(p) to a married couple they were rejects and should be treated thusly.At the end of the obtain Will Marchmills imagination leads him to believe that he and Ellas youngest son was actually the son of Robert Trewes in spite of the fact that they never met, his final line and the final line in the book sums up the ideas of the time about by-blow children Get away, you poor little bratwurst You are nothing to me The idea that you are rejected from society regardless of class of family if you are illegitimate is perhaps the main issue to do with social class in the text, linking although not completely with the idea of class in TKAMB.I have dealt with some ideas of prejudice and class, prejudice against blacks and women, the social status of people in Maycomb and of the Marchmills and other families like them in the 1800s. I have identified that the authors deal with it in unalike ways, Harper Lee is more direct and to the point with describing racism and social etiquette whereas Thomas Hardy suggests it but does not openly say that such things are wrong.The agent for this could be because TKAMB is written from the first person viewpoint and individual beliefs and reasons feature much more in the story line, An Imaginative Woman is written from the third person viewpoint and is as such an key rather than a personal experience, you are distanced from the plot and personal beliefs are left for you to decide. The stories differ again, TKAMB is a novel and whence has more room to describe and exhibition the ideas of the time, whereas An Imaginative Woman is a short story and does not develop as much.The language differs as TKAMB is set in 1920s/30s America and the Deep Southern American colloquial style of speech the text is perhaps more easily interpreted as it is not complex language, the legal injury used are more up to date and understood today. An Imaginative Woman is written in early new English and some of the terms are very outdated and hard to drudge without further help from dictionaries or thesauruses this makes it harder to pick out points from it and to see the prejudice or social attitudes.I have explained about the social attitudes and how they govern people within the stories and I think that this is very important to both stories plots, it helps shape the people and gives you a good idea of what life was like at the time, both stories end tragically in someway or another and I believe this is a deliberate move by both authors to suggest that prejudice and isms (sexism, racism etc) are in the end tragic.